Posts Tagged ‘market update’

New Online Help From Fannie Mae

By BOB TEDESCHI

SINCE foreclosures started to rise sharply in 2007, struggling borrowers have been offered a lot of help online. Some is well-meaning, but some is simply a scam in the form of expensive “debt relief” services that may be offered free elsewhere.

This month Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored entity that helps set lending standards for most mortgages, started a Web site,KnowYourOptions.com, that has elements setting it apart from most of those aiming to prevent foreclosure. Everything on the site is available in Spanish or English, for example, which helps to reach the large number of Hispanic borrowers who mortgage executives and analysts said were the targets of subprime lenders in 2005 and 2006.

In some areas of the site, a guide offers videotaped explanations of what users might accomplish in that section. For instance, in a section titled “Take Action,” the spokeswoman advises among other things that “you can’t get help until you contact your mortgage company,” while explaining how to get started.

To encourage borrowers to take that step, the site includes video testimonials from people who have experienced similar issues. A section on forbearance, for instance, features a video from an owner who qualified for such help, and one from a housing counselor about the process…Read more.

A new normal for real estate?

The bad news continues to get worse. With existing home sales experiencing a record decline and dropping way beyond what all economists expected, who knows when the housing market will recover, if ever. Everyone, from politicians and government officials to underwater homeowners and developers, are desperately following every bit of real estate data that comes out, looking for any signs that point to a brighter future.

Many experts say that real estate will not get better until unemployment improves. However, some economists also say that a higher than average unemployment rate may be the new normal. It will not be above 10%, like it is currently, but it may never get back down to the average of 5%. If that is the case, could the current deflating, stagnant housing market be real estate’s new normal?

The housing crisis has already unveiled a new shift in thinking for most Americans. For our parents generation and all the generations before, buying a home was a solid, nearly guaranteed investment. Working and saving wasn’t the way most built a nest egg or acquired wealth; it was through owning a home and the appreciation that came along with it. This was one of the hallmarks of what has been the federal government’s housing policy on promoting home ownership. Being a homeowner most often meant building wealth. And what politician didn’t like seeing their constituents happy and satisfied as they saw their net worth grown?

New York Times article highlights this new outlook, saying that real estate as our parents knew it is gone. No longer is buying a house the sure fire way to build wealth.

[M]any real estate experts now believe that home ownership will never again yield rewards like those enjoyed in the second half of the 20th century, when houses not only provided shelter but also a plump nest egg.The wealth generated by housing in those decades…powered the economy, paying for the education of children and grandchildren, keeping the cruise ships and golf courses full and the restaurants humming.

More than likely, that era is gone for good.

Read more

California has 2.3M ‘underwater’ homes

California is one of five states with the most “negative equity” in its home market, according to a report by CoreLogic Inc.

The Santa Ana business (NYSE: CLGX) said 33 percent of residential properties with mortgages in the Golden State were “underwater,” meaning the property is worth less than is owed on the loan. The figures are for the end of the second quarter.

That works out to 2.26 million underwater properties in the state. Another 286,000 homes were “near negative equity.”

Total outstanding mortgage debt in California was $2.03 trillion at the end of the second quarter, according to the report.

Read more

Nationally, Existing Home Sales Decline Following Expiration of Home Buyer Tax Credit

Existing home sales dropped 27.2 percent nationally to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.83 million units in July from a downwardly revised 5.26 million in June, and are 25.5 percent below the 5.14 million-unit level in July 2009, according to a report issued today by the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR). The report attributed the drop largely to the expiration of the federal home buyer tax credit and concern about the strength of the economic recovery.

NAR chief economist, Lawrence Yun, said a soft sales pace likely will continue for a few additional months. “Consumers rationally jumped into the market before the deadline for the home buyer tax credit expired. Since May, after the deadline, contract signings have been notably lower and a pause period for home sales is likely to last through September,” he said. “However, given the rock-bottom mortgage interest rates and historically high housing affordability conditions, the pace of a sales recovery could pick up quickly, provided the economy consistently adds jobs.

“Even with sales pausing for a few months, annual sales are expected to reach 5 million in 2010 because of healthy activity in the first half of the year. To place in perspective, annual sales averaged 4.9 million in the past 20 years, and 4.4 million over the past 30 years,” Yun said

The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $182,600 in July, up 0.7 percent from a year ago. Distressed home sales are unchanged from June, accounting for 32 percent of transactions in July; they were 31 percent in July 2009.

Total housing inventory at the end of July increased 2.5 percent to 3.98 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 12.5-month supply at the current sales pace, up from an 8.9-month supply in June. Raw unsold inventory is still 12.9 percent below the record of 4.58 million in July 2008.

Single-family home sales dropped 27.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.37 million in July from a pace of 4.62 million in June, and are 25.6 percent below the 4.53 million level in July 2009; they were the lowest since May 1995 when the sales rate was 3.34 million. The median existing single-family home price was $183,400 in July, which is 0.9 percent above a year ago.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the West fell 25.0 percent and are 23.0 percent below a year ago. The median price in the West was $224,800, up 3.3 percent from July 2009.

But in the West, sales in the price ranges typical of San Francisco properties was down by only 11.9 percent for properties selling for $550 to 750 thousand, down 6.8 percent for properties selling for $750 thousand and $1 million and up 7.8 percent for properties selling for properties above $1 million price.

Market Charts: Median Sales Price for Houses in SF

Median Sales Price for SF Houses: for the week ending August 15th, the median sales price was almost exactly the average median over the past 6 months.

Market Charts: Percent of Listings Accepting Offers

This is a weekly chart, so there will be more fluctuations. Nonetheless, homes Accepting Offers has been relatively stable over the last 6 months.

Market Charts: Past 3 weeks, more listings expiring or being withdrawn than closing escrow

Sold Listings vs. Expired/Withdrawn Listings:

July’s “Crashing” Sales – Here’s What’s Going on in SF

There have been hundreds of the-sky-is-falling articles everywhere, in every major newspaper, about how sales drastically slumped in July when compared with May, or when compared to July of last year, both nationally and in the bay area.

But with statistics, context is everything, and these articles show a fundamental lack of understanding of current context and specifically what’s going on in SF.

The first chart below is of the last 2 years’ home sales in SF. July 2010 is indeed well below May 2010, as well as well below July 09 and July 08. However, this is almost completely a function of the fact that deals that would have naturally and typically accepted offers (ratified) in May 2010 were rushed into April so as to meet the Federal Tax Credit deadline. Because of that crush of April ratifications, closed sales in May and June soared way over the sales rate of past years, AND May ratifications this year were much lower than normal. Typically May is one of the highest ratification months of the year; low May ratifications translated to lower July closings. Typically, July is one of the highest closed sales months because of the high May ratifications. With the unusual events this year, the numbers were thrown off – which created the dramatic percentage declines everyone is chattering on about.

Remember: closed sales are 30 – 60 days behind the market (the time of offers being accepted). To get a sense of current market activity, one looks atratifications, as in the second chart below.

In the third chart below, the Months’ Supply of Inventory for SF  houses and condos is shown over the past 2 years. MSI, at a moderately low 3.8 months of inventory, hasn’t budged in three months – again one can see the effect of the April tax credit rush on the chart — and it is almost exactly the same as in July 08 and July 09.  (The lower the MSI, the hotter the market.)

Closed Home Sales in SF over the past 25 Months:

Below, we see the huge surge of ratifications in April which (stealing normal early May ratifications) led to the large decline in May. Thus May’s number of accepted offers is below past years. But June 2010 ratifications are above last year’s. And July’s ratifications are above July 2009 and July 2008. That is not an indication of a collapsing market. Yes, the market surged in April due to the expiring tax credit, but except for the initial effect on May ratifications (and the resulting effect on July closings), the expiring tax credit hasn’t affected June and July ratifications at all.

Accepted Offers on SF Homes over the past 25 Months:

Since the SF home market started recovering in spring 2009 from the “crash” of autumn 2008, Months’ Supply of Inventory has been very stable, delineating a relatively stable market, running typically between 3 to 4 months of inventory. This is generally considered a moderately low MSI, signifying a relatively strong and consistent buyer demand. Again, it is unchanged for three months, and almost identical to the MSI recorded one year ago and two years ago.

Months’ Supply of Inventory: San Francisco Houses & Condos

5 Reasons Why You Should Buy a Home Today

by STEVE HARNEY

Homeownership almost seems like a dirty word in today’s society. People are blogging, tweeting and facebooking their belief that buying a home is just plain stupid. I respect their opinion on the issue though I totally disagree. Why?

This might be the best time to buy a home in American real estate history.

Some might think I’m crazy. Cynics might think that I am saying this because I still hold a real estate license (though I have not listed nor sold a home in ten years). My reason for saying it is actually quite simple. Owning a home makes more sense than not owning a home for the vast majority of families in this country. Let me give you five reasons why.

1. Real Estate is a Great Long Term Investment

Don’t take my word on this. This is what Mike Mandel, former chief economist atBusinessWeek and current Senior Fellow at Wharton’s Mack Center for Technological Innovation, had to say:

We’ve just had the biggest boom and bust in real estate in recent history. Nevertheless, real estate has still greatly outperformed the stock market over the past ten years.

Below is his chart actually showing the difference between real estate and the stock market.

2. A Home Is a Better Place to Raise a Family

Don’t take my word on this. When Fannie Mae asked current renters for the major reason to buy a house in their  National Housing Survey 2010, these were the answers renters gave (they could pick multiple answers):

  • 78% said it was a good place to raise children
  • 75% said because they would feel safe
  • 70% said because you have control of your own space

3. A Home Creates a Sense of Community

Don’t take my word on this. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York just published a paper The Homeownership Gap. The paper explained:

Because owners have a financial interest in their property, they have incentives to take measures that will maintain or increase the value of that property. Some of these measures—such as fixing a leaky roof—are closely related to the house itself. Others, such as investing resources in the betterment of the neighborhood and the community, have broader beneficial effects on the local area, creating what economists call “positive externalities.”

Read more

Market Charts: New Listings Coming on Market Slow

As is typical. Usually the next big rush of new listings occurs after Labor Day.